Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: cell, mobile, Pew, sext, sexting, teen, Text
Recently, the Pew Research Center released findings on teens (aged 12-17) and their propensity to sext or send dirty text messages. While only 4% reported that that had SENT a sext in the past and 15% claim to have received one, but we all know with a sensitive subject concerning something like a cell phone (often paid for by a parent) and sex (something those same parents hope is not happening yet), many respondents would be less apt to answer honestly. This happens in survey situations whether there are perceived immediate consequences or not. And it’s always a safer bet to be the innocent receiver of such a taboo item, rather than being the sender so the disparity in that finding is also a no-brainer. Plus the number of self-proclaimed sext-ers increases to 17% when the teen pays for their own mobile. Hmmm, no one else able to call the cell carrier and ask for a print out of all the incoming and outgoing messages means more daring on the part of the teen. Once again, makes sense.
Consider what one respondent said about her past sexting: “When I was about 14-15 years old, I received/sent these types of pictures. Boys usually ask for them or start that type of conversation. My boyfriend, or someone I really liked asked for them. And I felt like if I didn’t do it, they wouldn’t continue to talk to me. At the time, it was no big deal. But now looking back it was definitely inappropriate and over the line.” It’s the same kind of pressure that young girls have had to deal with for generations during the teen years, but this new method offers more dire consequences than the usual he-said/she-said rumor mill; photographic and text proof of falling for the guy’s lines. The Pew study also found that the more intensely a teen uses their mobile device, the more likely they are to engage in sexting. This makes perfect sense; as you become more familiar and comfortable with any technology, the more likely you are to try daring or unfamiliar activities on said technology.
Many states are looking to combat the problem with the force of a sledgehammer in place of a flyswatter by trying to institute child pornography penalties on teens who have been exposed in sexual photographs on the mobile phones of others, as well as penalities for those who are the owners of those same devices. This is just prosecution of the victim in the case of those who had been photographed. Talk about injustice! It’s bad enough you made an error in judgment and either took/had a naughty photo taken of you, but now to be sentenced as if you were some sleezy back-alley kiddy-porn king! And for those owning the device housing the photo in question? Imagine those racing hormones and being given a free nudie photo…how many do you think would immediately erase it and chastise the person who sent it to them as a pornographer? Not many.
Now don’t get me wrong. I don’t like this idea any more than the parent of a teen would. I think of my younger sister and I don’t want to think of what she uses her cell for now that she’s 22, let alone what she would have done at age 16! But this kind of legislation is not going to work. And parents agree because they are coming forward and counter-suing the lawyers, with the help of the ACLU.
So what do we do to help these young persons realize that they are not invincible, that these kinds of casual indiscretions and lapses in judgment will haunt them, because NOTHING CAN BE TRULY DELETED FROM THE INTERNET? Warn them of the possible consequences, tell them the possible scenarios they can get in trouble for and then let them deal with the chips if they fall? Sounds like giving kids bad ideas and asking them not to act them out. Ban cell phones for anyone under age 18? Also, a definite fix for the problem, but also extreme and something many teens and parents alike will not be fond of.
Any other ideas?
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: Food Service, GuestBridge, mobile, OpenTable, SMS, Text
I am sure that you have gone to a causal restaurant at 7:00 PM on a Saturday and had to wait for a table. This wait could have been short, maybe 10 minutes, or perhaps as long as 45 minutes. Maybe you went to the bar and had some drinks while you waited, or perhaps you went outside and meandered around the mall or shopping center. But I bet you have all (at some point) gone back to the host stand because you thought they forgot to call you…or because you heard a name called that sounded like yours…or you were just hungry and wanted to be seated. Now imagine that none of these scenarios were necessary.
Say hello to GuestBridge, a software company that has created a “host stand management system” that captures guest information, tracks repeat diners, records birthdays and other important holidays to your repeat diners, personalizes their visit, invites them back to dine again works with other restaurant computer systems and your own website, and pages your guests to come to the host stand to be seated via their own cell phone. No more weird little pagers or hostesses who don’t like to use the intercom system because it sounds funny. This system can also change plotted tables to accommodate large parties and walk-ins, makes the seating more equal to your staff, tracks guest spending and when a party is about to be done eating, paying the check and leaving.
Another less integrated system is readyping, a Chicago based firm which has created software that sends a text message to the guest when their table is ready.
A third system that I found, Queuent, also calls guests on their cell phones when their tables are ready, but has a back-up plan in case the person doesn’t have one; they use the ‘wait here and come back and check in the quoted time period.’ Well, DUH, this is used already, so it’s kind of a no-brainer. However, the FAQ page of this site reminds the establishment owner that Queuent never sells their contact info: “All phone numbers are removed from the system as soon as guests are seated or deleted from the wait list,” (Queuent FAQ, 2009). This may make us all feel safe and our privacy secured, but it doesn’t say much for the ability of the system to track past diners, VIP’s, or any of the other options listed by GuestBridge above.
References:
GuestBridge. (n.d.). “Who We Serve.” Retrieved May 28, 2009 from http://www.guestbridge.com/casualrestaurants.html
Queuent FAQ. (2009). Retrieved May 28, 2009 from http://www.queuent.com/index.asp?view=faq
Readyping. (2009). “About Us.” Retrieved May 28, 2009 from http://www.readyping.com/about-us

